The best alternatives to Manhattan Active Transportation Management (TMS) (2026)
As of November 2026: even lists 10 alternatives to Manhattan Active Transportation Management (TMS) in the category Digitizing transport processes, the highest rated is TransWareNET® with ★5,0 from 1 reviews (category average: ★4,6). The order is set by the even Score from published reviews, solutions with fewer than three reviews come after the rest. Plans, advertising and co-marketing do not change it.

Manhattan Active Transportation Management (TMS)
Manhattan Associates GmbHNo reviews yet10 alternatives at a glance
Rank 1

Rank 2

Rank 3

Rank 4

Rank 5

Rank 6

Rank 7
Rank 8

Rank 9
Rank 10
Manhattan Active Transportation Management (TMS) and alternatives in a feature comparison
| Feature | Manhattan Active Transportation Management (TMS)(this solution) | SIRUM TMS | TransWareNET® | AEB Transport Management Software |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | ★4,2 (8) | ★5,0 (1) | ★4,7 (1) |
| Digital Documents | E-CMR | — | — | E-CMR |
| Partner Integration | Customer Portal | Customer Portal | API, Supplier Portal | Customer Portal |
| User Interface | Mobile App, Web-based | Mobile App, Web-based | Desktop Client, Mobile App, Web-based | Mobile App, Web-based |
| Market segment | Enterprise, Mid-market | Enterprise, Mid-market | Enterprise, Small business, Mid-market | Enterprise, Mid-market |
| Soft Facts | 24/7 Support | — | 24/7 Support, Cloud, ERP-independent, ISO 27001 certified, AI-based, On-premise, REST API, Server location in Europe, Standalone, TMS-independent, WMS-independent | 24/7 Support |
| Pricing model | Subscription / SaaS | One-time license, Subscription / SaaS, Pay-per-use / transaction-based | Subscription / SaaS, One-time license, Pay-per-use / transaction-based, Subscription, One-time payment, License-based, Rental, Pay-Per-Use | Pay-per-use / transaction-based |
| Number of customers | 1.200 Customers | 100 Customers | 120 Customers | 95 Customers |
| Security features | — | — | Automated backup, GDPR compliance, Data encryption, Intrusion Detection/Prevention Systems, Role-based access control | — |
| System functionality | — | — | Automatic rerouting options, Automated dispatching, Real-time tracking, Capacity planning, Load optimization, Multi-depot support, Simulation capabilities, Batch picking, Crossdock, Dynamic order prioritization, Cycle counting, Advance shipping notification, Batch management, Multi-client capable, Best before dates, Serial numbers, Automatic Slot Assignment, Notifications & Alerts, Dynamic Slot Adjustment, Real-Time Changes | — |
| AI Usage | — | — | AI-supported features (e.g. forecasting, optimization, image recognition) | — |
| Considered Restrictions | — | — | EU-Regeln, Individuelle Regeln, nationale Vorschriften | — |
| Data sources | — | — | ERP, TMS, WMS, manual input | — |
| Freight categorization | — | — | Hazardous goods, Standard goods, Temperature-sensitive | — |
| Sustainability features | — | — | CO₂ offset programs, Emissions tracking, Routes for electric vehicles | — |
| Navigation systems | — | — | Google Maps, HERE, TomTom | — |
| Route planning priorities | — | — | Distance, Cost, Time | — |
| Interfaces to telematics systems | — | — | CAN bus, proprietary systems | — |
| Mode of transport | — | — | Rail, Bicycle, Aircraft, Truck, Ships | — |
How do the alternatives differ from Manhattan Active Transportation Management (TMS)?
- SIRUM TMS: Pricing model: One-time license, Subscription / SaaS, Pay-per-use / transaction-based instead of Subscription / SaaS; Number of customers: 100 Customers instead of 1.200 Customers.
- TransWareNET®: Partner Integration: API, Supplier Portal instead of Customer Portal; User Interface: Desktop Client, Mobile App, Web-based instead of Mobile App, Web-based; Market segment: Enterprise, Small business, Mid-market instead of Enterprise, Mid-market; Soft Facts: 24/7 Support, Cloud, ERP-independent, ISO 27001 certified, AI-based, On-premise, REST API, Server location in Europe, Standalone, TMS-independent, WMS-independent instead of 24/7 Support; Pricing model: Subscription / SaaS, One-time license, Pay-per-use / transaction-based, Subscription, One-time payment, License-based, Rental, Pay-Per-Use instead of Subscription / SaaS; Number of customers: 120 Customers instead of 1.200 Customers.
- AEB Transport Management Software: Pricing model: Pay-per-use / transaction-based instead of Subscription / SaaS; Number of customers: 95 Customers instead of 1.200 Customers.
- 1st Log: Market segment: Enterprise, Small business, Mid-market instead of Enterprise, Mid-market; Pricing model: Subscription / SaaS, Pay-per-use / transaction-based instead of Subscription / SaaS.
- EPG Transportmanagementsystem (TMS): User Interface: Desktop Client, Mobile App, Web-based instead of Mobile App, Web-based; Number of customers: 100 Customers instead of 1.200 Customers.
Frequently asked questions about Manhattan Active Transportation Management (TMS) alternatives
What is the best alternative to Manhattan Active Transportation Management (TMS)?
On even, TransWareNET® by CSD Transport Software GmbH is currently the highest-rated alternative to Manhattan Active Transportation Management (TMS): ★5,0 from 1 reviews (as of November 2026).
How many alternatives to Manhattan Active Transportation Management (TMS) are there?
even currently lists 10 alternatives to Manhattan Active Transportation Management (TMS) in the Digitizing transport processes category, with vendor profiles and, where available, real user reviews.
Can I compare Manhattan Active Transportation Management (TMS) directly with alternatives?
Yes. On even you can line up to 4 solutions in the same category feature by feature, including reviews and verified details.

